|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
home | film reviews | featured article | calls for papers | in memoriam | contact | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
issue 2.2 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intimate Literacies: The Ethics of Teaching Sexually Explicit FIlms By Celine Parreñas Shimizu |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The intimate literacy approach demonstrates how a critical language might be forged to address the acts that compose racialized subjects in the movies. Intimate literacy builds on elements of film language to go beyond the limits of identifying “good” or “bad” sexualities, or deeming sexual identities and acts as inherent or fixed. When we identify particular and concrete individual action, we can see the complexity and range of emotion composing relations. Because sexuality is dynamic and different depending on who participates, sexual acts are indeed, as Cherríe Moraga famously attests, microcosms of social relations. As such, we can read sexual acts as encounters of power and subject formation. Thus, sexual representations of racial subjects have the potential to illuminate how power circulates and works on and off screen. It is not enough to see Asian American men and women represented; we must also see and analyze how they are constructed and what they are concretely doing in these representations. While moral panic logic decides what sexually explicit scenes already mean, intimate literacy insists on assessing what composes the meanings in each representation and how the act of interpretation can generate surprising discoveries. For example, to tout Sessue Hayakawa’s character in The Cheat (1915) as a violent and rapacious representation, without close readings of the intensity of his performances, evaluating his motivations within the diegetic world of the film, accounting for the admiring responses to his work, or recognizing his own efforts as an actor to establish a studio that produced films that richly represent Asians in cinema, is to miss the complexity of representations of race and sexuality as an important site of cultural struggle.
Professor Celine Parreñas Shimizu is a filmmaker and film scholar based at the University of California at Santa Barbara. Her first book, The Hypersexuality of Race: Performing Asian/ American Women on Screen and Scene (Duke University Press, 2007), won the Cultural Studies Book Award from the Association for Asian American Studies, and her second book, Straitjacket Sex Screens: Mapping Asian American Manhoods in the Movies, is forthcoming from Stanford University Press. Her latest film, Birthright: Mothering across Difference (2009), won the Best Feature Documentary Award at the Big Mini DV Festival in New York and is available at progressivefilms.org. She is currently a Visiting Scholar at the Center for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity at Stanford University..
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Design by Joanna Wyzgowska. Copyright © 2014. All rights reserved. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||