|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
home | film reviews | featured article | calls for papers | in memoriam | contact | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
issue 1.1 | issue 1.2 | issue 2.1 | issue 2.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Parliament Film Collective's
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Owls was made by a Parliament of approximately sixty real-life OWLs (Older Wiser Lesbians), as well as younger women, and a small number of queer men. Many in our collective cut our filmmaking teeth during the glory days of New Queer Cinema. Thus, the films we have made are the first to be included in our partial canon: The Watermelon Woman (Cheryl Dunye, 1995), Go Fish (Rose Troche, 1994), Tick Tock Lullaby (Lisa Gornick, 2007), B.D. Women (Inge Blackman, 2008), Hooters (Anna Margarita Albelo, 2010), Swimming (P. David Ebersole and Todd Hughes, 2010), and 2 Tickets to the Movies (Michael Lucid, 2010). To make The Owls, many of us returned, older and sometimes wiser, to the possibilities of collective/lesbian creative processes, queer community, and microbudget cinema. In the process, we tried to learn from and rethink the formal strategies of lesbian cinema, particularly because we were making a feature film for almost no money. So we also looked to even earlier patriarchal images of lesbian dysfunction (The Killing of Sister George [Robert Aldrich, 1968], The Fox [Mark Rydell, 1967], The Children’s Hour [William Wyler, 1961]), as well as to the films of the New Queer Cinema of gay men: the works of Todd Haynes, Tom Kalin, and Greg Araki, not to mention David Lynch (in regards to using genre and maintaining an avant-garde sensibility).
It is critical to note that unlike a more typical apprenticeship, the members of our collective were seeking a very particular type of learning: about the complex integration of story and style, individual and community. In the question-and-answer session after the screening of the film at the Berlinale, Dunye remarks that The Owls is about “breaking and reinventing film form, pushing storytelling.” It is a given in the collective that our complex, multifaceted stories of situated sexualities demand formal invention (in style and method). Similarly, an emphasis on learning from multifarious queer stylistics—beautiful and subtle enough to hold the range, complexity, and pleasures of our experiences—brought Michael Lucid to play the role of the gay realtor for the collective:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Design by Joanna Wyzgowska. Copyright © 2014. All rights reserved. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||